by Craig
Templeton
Sales Training Techniques Inc.
Napa, California
For too many years our
home office people and field managers have unfortunately
with the paradigm* that agent retention has and
will continue to be about 20 percent after four
– five years. Recruit 100 agents – keep 20; that’s about as good as we can do because that is what has
taken place in the past.
Dave Hilton, past president
of the Million Dollar Round Table, recently said
(while reviewing the top four home office priorities
expressed by CEOs), “If we concentrate on their
fourth priority, production, their top three priorities
will take care of themselves!” The top three priorities were profits, unit
cost and overhead.
Taking
off on Dave’s conclusion, you might ask, “What does
that have to do with prospecting?” Well, every manager
that I have ever talked to has said, “My agents
leave the business most often because they didn’t
get enough appointments!” Isn’t it true that prospecting leads to appointments,
appointments lead to sales, and sales lead to agent
success and retention? How often has an agent gone out of the business
doing 100 cases per year?
In other words, if the focus is on the prospecting
for adequate appointments, higher numbers of sales
will follow, and this will result in higher agent
retention rates.
Thank goodness there
are some sales managers who are creating a new paradigm!
Their agent case rate is 90-100 per year
on average and agent retention is 65 percent after
five years. In
addition, Sales Manager A is a teacher and mentor
for Sales Manager B, who is producing the same case
rate and high retention.
The message is clear – with proper agent
control, discipline, coaching and focus,
the prospecting results are staggeringly exciting!
What makes the difference
between the Old Paradigm and the New Paradigm?
The answers are simple but elusive. I can only give you the tools that I have learned
and used as an agent, as well the tools that Sales
Manager A and Sales Manager B are utilizing.
I
have had a rewarding three years on the “Seminar
Circuit.” Personally,
some of the most exciting things are what I have
learned, not about successful agents, but those
who fail – the “80 percent group” who come into
the business to be successful and just don’t last. If our industry wants to continue the old paradigm
– hire 100 agents to get 20 (find the needle in
the haystack), then profitability and unit cost will be the benchmarks.
If we can take on new management styles and
agent accountability, a new paradigm will surface
with productivity and agent retention solving the
home office blues. It is being done today! Isn’t it $worth$ the effort to set new standards
that increase retention by three times and the case
rate by two and one-half times?
Before
this can be done, we must recognize the psychological
traits that the “80 percent group” seems to possess
that stall achievement.
Consider the following Agent
Profile:
- A low level of self-discipline;
- A lack of ability to focus;
- A strong need to feel worthy on a minute-to-minute
basis; coupled with,
- Too many options to keep busy and feel
worth; and,
- A strong dislike of prospecting appointments.
I
have talked with agents in over 2300 seminars in
the last three years. Hearing their problems, and asking for their solutions to the prospecting problem, I am absolutely convinced that
my agent profile is correct!
Agents
openly admit that they see themselves in the “Agent
Profile.” They tell me that they are willing to de disciplined to success; that they did not come into the business to
be their own boss and self-employed: that they truly
didn’t come into the business for its freedom and
flexibility. These
are things one gets out of the business only after
they master the work of our business – prospecting
for appointments.
Keeping
in mind the agent profile, is it any wonder that
80 percent fail? If Sales Manager A and Sales Manager B have
increased to 65 percent by getting the agent case
rate hovering 100 per year, why don’t the home office
executives and sales managers learn their techniques
for success? Agent
retention and case rate go hand in hand, but you
cannot have high retention rate without a higher
case rate. Case
rate comes first, and this comes by having and maintaining
appointments.
The
answer then is high discipline placed on the agent
to prospect routinely! The discipline is supplied
by the management.
The prospecting process is similar to a basketball
coach and his team. The time, place, duration and daily practice
routines are clearly controlled by the coach.
In
the book, The Game of Work, the author says, “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.” Think of what this means. By having precise measured activities – numbers
of calls, prospecting blocks of time and measured
appointments – you can then measure
your success. Where
to be, when to begin, how long to continue, what
to accomplish, and finally the freedom to quit because
you have won the game, daily!
The
successful agent is one who makes a habit out of doing the thing the unsuccessful person
fails to do – prospecting. The
unsuccessful person is one who does not allow himself
or herself to be uncomfortable
long enough to be successful. Prospecting is uncomfortable; prospecting is
hard work.
Very
simply, Sales Manager A and Sales Manager B have
taken the choice out of prospecting for their agents.
They are instituting a precise prospecting
practice time and place with measured prospecting
goals. Most
importantly, they supply their agents the discipline
necessary to get adequate appointments to meet their
goals.
In
a short time, the agent provide
disappears because the manager supplies the discipline,
makes the agent focus and takes away the options. The agent, therefore, is provided with self-satisfaction
(“I feel worthy”) by successfully mastering prospecting
for appointments.
Yes,
there is a new paradigm and because of it production
is up…retention is up; production is up…profit is
up; production is up…unit cost is down; production
is up…overhead is under control.
*Paradigm
is a limited perspective caused by our experiences.
It prevents us from seeing beyond our experiences
and, therefore, we accept what is and not what can
be.
Return
to "Wander in Wonderland"